Name: Claudia Ciesla
Birth Place: woodzislaw slaski, Poland
Measurements: 32DD 38-26-37 in (98-64-96 cm)
Height: 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m)
Eye colour: Blue-Green
Hair colour: Dark-Blond
Ethnicity: German/Polish
Claudia Ciesla picture gallery
Claudia Ciesla is a German model, actress, and singer of Polish descent. She was born in Wodzislaw slaski, Poland. Her father is Polish and her mother is German. She started modelling at the age of 15.
Name: Claudia Ciesla
Birth Place: woodzislaw slaski, Poland
Measurements: 32DD 38-26-37 in (98-64-96 cm)
Height: 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m)
Eye colour: Blue-Green
Hair colour: Dark-Blond
Ethnicity: German/Polish
Name: Claudia Ciesla
Birth Place: woodzislaw slaski, Poland
Measurements: 32DD 38-26-37 in (98-64-96 cm)
Height: 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m)
Eye colour: Blue-Green
Hair colour: Dark-Blond
Ethnicity: German/Polish
Brief Health Update
I had three clinic visits at my cancer center today. Following a physical exam by my oncologist he said I looked great. I asked about a longer term prognosis. Paraphrasing, he said that I’ve had no evidence of disease for long enough such that he felt the immediate danger was far reduced. He also said I beat some pretty tough odds to be where I am today with no evidence of disease for 19 months. We discussed the rash which I mentioned in my last blog entry. He did not feel it was cancer treatment related. My other concerns about poor blood circulation and foot neuropathy did not deter him from having me continue on with the daily dose of 150 mg Tarceva pill. In about 6 six weeks I’ll go back for a head and neck CT scan.
On the obturator (mouth prosthesis) front, we abandoned trying to get the new one to fit properly. They adjusted my old obturator. With the device in, I’m estimating that my speech is approaching 85% of the quality of my pre-surgical voice. It still takes some effort, but I’m quite pleased with this progress.
I also saw the physicians and clinicians in the Supportive Care unit. They have been a great resource to me over the past year. They helped me address fatigue, nutrition, and depression. Given the positive trend in my health (both physical and mental), we agreed that I’d call them if there is a future need.
That sums it up for the day. Take care and good health to you all.
On the obturator (mouth prosthesis) front, we abandoned trying to get the new one to fit properly. They adjusted my old obturator. With the device in, I’m estimating that my speech is approaching 85% of the quality of my pre-surgical voice. It still takes some effort, but I’m quite pleased with this progress.
I also saw the physicians and clinicians in the Supportive Care unit. They have been a great resource to me over the past year. They helped me address fatigue, nutrition, and depression. Given the positive trend in my health (both physical and mental), we agreed that I’d call them if there is a future need.
That sums it up for the day. Take care and good health to you all.
Treating Cancer as a Chronic Illness
I had a lively discussion a little over a week ago on the subject of taking chemotherapy drugs (any chemotherapy drug) to keep my cancer (if it exists) at bay. What I tried to explain in this theoretical discussion was the potentially toxic side effects of the chemo drugs (e.g., stroke, death) and as a result why one would want to not take these drugs. I’m not sure the recipient of this discussion understood my perspective.
Today, my brother sent an excerpt he had found on the FDA MedWatch website. The article posted on 5/9/09 (less than one week ago) was about Tarceva. See reference 1 below for the full article. In essence, the pharmaceutical company, Genentech, that manufactures Tarceva added wording to their “WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS” section on their prescription instructions. Fatality was one of the new adverse side effects. Per my prescription, I have taken the maximum recommended dose of Tarceva (150 mg) daily for over 17 months. That works out to 517 doses. So, my theoretical discussion of just over a week ago has turned into something a bit closer to home. Although rash was a previously known side effect, the new warning seemed to heighten this side affect as a more severe warning sign. To compound the issue, I have a moderate rash on my side that appeared about a week ago. Even before I became aware of the updated warning today, it was one of my top subjects for tomorrow’s cancer center clinic visit.
Here’s what I currently believe. On the plus side, Tarceva is keeping my cancer at bay. On the negative side, Tarceva is causing a moderate rash, continued neuropathy in my feet, and poor blood circulation. I’m guessing my oncologist will examine me tomorrow and recommend that I begin taking a smaller daily dosage with a warning about staying in close touch with him if the rash gets worse.
The bottom line to all this is that treating cancer as a chronic illness is a step in the right direction, but it is not without its pitfalls. This can certainly be a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
On a separate subject, my original diagnosis was April 29 2005. That’s over 4 years ago. I’m still here, but the journey has left me scarred both physically and mentally for life. Last night I had a dream (actually a nightmare) that my right side neck lymph nodes were swollen. This would mean (at least in my mind) that my cancer had returned. It was so real that I spent time feeling the lymph nodes in my neck when I woke up to see if they were swollen. They weren’t, so it was a dream. It was also a relief. This disease will never leave me completely alone. On that note…
Take care and good health to you all.
=======================
Reference:
http://www.fda.gov/medwAtch/safety/2009/safety09.htm#Tarceva
Today, my brother sent an excerpt he had found on the FDA MedWatch website. The article posted on 5/9/09 (less than one week ago) was about Tarceva. See reference 1 below for the full article. In essence, the pharmaceutical company, Genentech, that manufactures Tarceva added wording to their “WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS” section on their prescription instructions. Fatality was one of the new adverse side effects. Per my prescription, I have taken the maximum recommended dose of Tarceva (150 mg) daily for over 17 months. That works out to 517 doses. So, my theoretical discussion of just over a week ago has turned into something a bit closer to home. Although rash was a previously known side effect, the new warning seemed to heighten this side affect as a more severe warning sign. To compound the issue, I have a moderate rash on my side that appeared about a week ago. Even before I became aware of the updated warning today, it was one of my top subjects for tomorrow’s cancer center clinic visit.
Here’s what I currently believe. On the plus side, Tarceva is keeping my cancer at bay. On the negative side, Tarceva is causing a moderate rash, continued neuropathy in my feet, and poor blood circulation. I’m guessing my oncologist will examine me tomorrow and recommend that I begin taking a smaller daily dosage with a warning about staying in close touch with him if the rash gets worse.
The bottom line to all this is that treating cancer as a chronic illness is a step in the right direction, but it is not without its pitfalls. This can certainly be a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
On a separate subject, my original diagnosis was April 29 2005. That’s over 4 years ago. I’m still here, but the journey has left me scarred both physically and mentally for life. Last night I had a dream (actually a nightmare) that my right side neck lymph nodes were swollen. This would mean (at least in my mind) that my cancer had returned. It was so real that I spent time feeling the lymph nodes in my neck when I woke up to see if they were swollen. They weren’t, so it was a dream. It was also a relief. This disease will never leave me completely alone. On that note…
Take care and good health to you all.
=======================
Reference:
http://www.fda.gov/medwAtch/safety/2009/safety09.htm#Tarceva
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)